Mohamed Farrag v. Danielle Bryan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Mohamed Farrag v. Danielle Bryan

DecidedJanuary 22, 2015

Docket01-14-00713-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Mohamed Farrag v. Danielle Bryan (Mohamed Farrag v. Danielle Bryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mohamed Farrag v. Danielle Bryan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00713-CV

MOHAMED FARRAG, Appellant

V.

DANIELLE BRYAN, Appellee

Appeal from the 280th District Court of Harris County (Tr. Ct. No. 2014-38348)

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 29, 2014. Appellant, Mohamed Farrag, did not timely file a brief. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution.

It is further ORDERED that appellant pay all costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment rendered January 22, 2015.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI