Mohamed Alani v. Geico Indemnity Company

Michigan Supreme Court

Mohamed Alani v. Geico Indemnity Company

DecidedOctober 29, 2019

Docket157368

StatusPublished

This text of Mohamed Alani v. Geico Indemnity Company (Mohamed Alani v. Geico Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mohamed Alani v. Geico Indemnity Company, (Mich. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

157368 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman MOHAMED ALANI, Brian K. Zahra Plaintiff-Appellant, Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement v SC: 157368 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 334061 Wayne CC: 15-010052-NF GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, and PROGRESSIVE MARATHON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, and SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellee. __________________________________________/

By order of September 12, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Dye v Esurance Prop & Cas Ins Co (Docket No. 155784). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 11, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in Dye. We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.

CAVANAGH, J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow Miller, P.C.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 29, 2019 a1021 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

157368 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman MOHAMED ALANI, Brian K. Zahra Plaintiff-Appellant, Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement v SC: 157368 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices COA: 334061 Wayne CC: 15-010052-NF GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, and PROGRESSIVE MARATHON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants, and SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD., Defendant-Appellee. __________________________________________/

By order of September 12, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Dye v Esurance Prop & Cas Ins Co (Docket No. 155784). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on July 11, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in Dye. We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.

BERNSTEIN, J., did not participate because he has a family member with an interest that could be affected by the proceeding.

CAVANAGH, J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow Miller, P.C.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. October 29, 2019 a1021 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mohamed Alani v. Geico Indemnity Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamed-alani-v-geico-indemnity-company-mich-2019.