Mohamad v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJune 21, 2024
Docket16-1075
StatusPublished

This text of Mohamad v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Mohamad v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mohamad v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ************************* ALA MOHAMAD, * * No. 16-1075V Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. * Moran v. * * Filed: May 30, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * ************************* Richard Gage, Richard Gage, P.C., Cheyenne, WY, for petitioner; Voris Johnson, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On August 29, 2016, Ala Mohamad filed a petition seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 et seq., alleging that a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine he received on September 21, 2015 caused him to develop a neurological problem known as Guillain-Barré syndrome. After development of written evidence, the case proceeded to a hearing, and the parties submitted post-hearing briefs. On January

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website. 27, 2022, the undersigned determined that Mr. Mohamad is entitled to compensation.

On May 24, 2024, respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation, to which petitioner agrees. Based upon the record as a whole, the special master finds the Proffer reasonable and that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer. Pursuant to the attached Proffer, with Tab A, the court awards petitioner the following:

A. All items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A.

B. $561,869.00 in past and future lost earnings under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a)(3)(A).

C. $225,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4).

D. Funds to satisfy a State of Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing Medicaid lien in the amount of $92,602.13, which represents full satisfaction of any right of subrogation, assignment, claim, lien, or cause of action the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing may have against any individual as a result of any Medicaid payments the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing has made to or on behalf of petitioner from the date of his eligibility for benefits through the date of judgment in this case as a result of his vaccine-related injury suffered on or about September 21, 2015, under Title XIX of the Social Security Act.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 16-1075V according to this decision and the attached proffer.2

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 Any questions regarding this order may be directed to my law clerk, Christine Olson, at (202) 357-6360.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

3 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ALA MOHAMAD,

Petitioner, No. 16-1075V v. Special Master Moran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On August 29, 2016, Ala Mohamad (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under

the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act”

or “Act”), alleging that as a result of receiving a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”)

vaccination on September 21, 2015, he suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”). ECF

No. 1. On January 27, 2022, Special Master Moran issued a Ruling on Entitlement in favor of

petitioner. ECF No. 150. Respondent now proffers the following regarding the amount of

compensation to be awarded. 1

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged Linda Curtis RN, MS, CCM, CNLCP, and petitioner engaged Liz

Kattman, MS and Helen M. Woodard, M.A., of ReEntry Rehabilitation Services, Inc., to provide

1 The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages. However, respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f), to seek review of the Special Master’s January 27, 2022 Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to an award under the Vaccine Act. This right accrues following the issuance of the damages decision. an estimation of petitioner’s future vaccine injury-related needs. For the purposes of this proffer,

the term “vaccine injury” is as described in the Special Master’s January 27, 2022 Ruling on

Entitlement. All items of compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the

evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Ala

Mohamad, attached hereto as Tab A. 2 Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded all

items of compensation set forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab

A. Petitioner agrees.
B. Lost Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Ala Mohamad has suffered past

loss of earnings and will suffer future loss of earnings as a result of his vaccine-related injury.

Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded lost earnings as provided under

the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the appropriate award

for Ala Mohamad’s past and future lost earnings is $561,869.00. Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $225,000.00 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

agrees.

D. Medicaid Lien

Respondent proffers that Ala Mohamad should be awarded funds to satisfy a State of

Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing Medicaid lien in the amount of

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mohamad v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamad-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.