Mohamad v. Jackson

62 A.3d 374, 619 Pa. 345, 2013 WL 758104, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 28, 2013
DocketNo. 215 EM 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.3d 374 (Mohamad v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mohamad v. Jackson, 62 A.3d 374, 619 Pa. 345, 2013 WL 758104, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 361 (Pa. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2013, the Application for Leave to File Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the Application for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED. Finally, the Prothonotary is instructed to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.3d 374, 619 Pa. 345, 2013 WL 758104, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mohamad-v-jackson-pa-2013.