Mogul v. Miller
162 A. 515, 35 Del. 228, 5 W.W. Harr. 228, 1932 Del. LEXIS 23
Opinion
in granting the plaintiff’s motion to dismiss or strike out the defendant’s reasons for a new trial, held that the case was governed in principle by Simkin v. Cole, 2 W. W. Harr. (32 Del.) 271, 122 A. 191, and by Section 1430, Rev. Code 1915; and that such reasons should, therefore, have been filed on Monday, May 30, even though that was Memorial Day.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mogul v. Miller, 162 A. 515, 35 Del. 228, 5 W.W. Harr. 228, 1932 Del. LEXIS 23 (Del. Ct. App. 1932).
162 A. 515 (Mogul v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. Frank E. Best Inc.
768 A.2d 473 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 2000)