Mogul Construction Co. v. Silverman
This text of 283 A.D. 810 (Mogul Construction Co. v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a balance alleged to be due for work, labor, and services and for materials furnished, defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss the- complaint on the ground of res judicata. (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 4.) Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldoek, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D. 810, 129 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mogul-construction-co-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1954.