Moftiz v. Moftiz
This text of 50 A.D.2d 901 (Moftiz v. Moftiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a matrimonial action in which plaintiff was awarded a judgment of divorce, she appeals from so much of that judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 10, 1975, as dismissed her third cause of action, which sought to impress a trust upon the marital home. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. The rule has long been settled that in order to establish a constructive trust there must be a confidential relationship wherein one party relies, to his detriment, upon a promise of another, which promise is subsequently breached, resulting in unjust enrichment to the latter (Foreman v Foreman, 251 NY 237; Sinclair v Purdy, 235 NY 245). This record does not establish the element of unjust enrichment. The bare relationship of husband and wife is inadequate to support the impression of a constructive trust on property. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 901, 377 N.Y.S.2d 931, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moftiz-v-moftiz-nyappdiv-1975.