Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. Byrd

38 S.W. 667, 1 Indian Terr. 131, 1897 Indian Terr. LEXIS 34
CourtCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
DecidedJanuary 30, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 S.W. 667 (Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. Byrd, 38 S.W. 667, 1 Indian Terr. 131, 1897 Indian Terr. LEXIS 34 (Conn. 1897).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

Various entries and orders purporting tc have been made in the commissioner’s court appear in th< record brought to this court upon appeal, but nowhere ii such record is there a transcript of the proceedings had be fore the commissioner, certified by him. In the absence o such a transcript, so certified by the commissioner, th< jurisdiction of the United States Court for the Northern district of the Indian Territory to try this cause, and t< render jndgment upon appeal, is not shown, and consequent ly the jurisdiction of this court cannot be invoked. Wise v Yell, 7 Ark. 11; Watts vs Hill, 7 Ark. 203. The appeal i dismissed.

Kilgore, J'., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wettermark v. Roark
1908 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Waitman v. Bowles
3 Indian Terr. 294 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 S.W. 667, 1 Indian Terr. 131, 1897 Indian Terr. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moffitt-west-drug-co-v-byrd-ctappindterr-1897.