Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. Byrd

38 S.W. 667, 1 Indian Terr. 131, 1897 Indian Terr. LEXIS 34
Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory·Decided January 30, 1897·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Lewis, J.

Various entries and orders purporting tc have been made in the commissioner’s court appear in th< record brought to this court upon appeal, but nowhere ii such record is there a transcript of the proceedings had be fore the commissioner, certified by him. In the absence o such a transcript, so certified by the commissioner, th< jurisdiction of the United States Court for the Northern district of the Indian Territory to try this cause, and t< render jndgment upon appeal, is not shown, and consequent ly the jurisdiction of this court cannot be invoked. Wise v Yell, 7 Ark. 11; Watts vs Hill, 7 Ark. 203. The appeal i dismissed.

Kilgore, J'., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. Byrd, 38 S.W. 667, 1 Indian Terr. 131, 1897 Indian Terr. LEXIS 34 (Conn. 1897).

38 S.W. 667 (Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wettermark v. Roark
1908 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Waitman v. Bowles
3 Indian Terr. 294 (Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory, 1900)