Moffitt v. Moffitt

19 So. 2d 722, 246 Ala. 174, 1944 Ala. LEXIS 485
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 16, 1944
Docket4 Div. 350.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 19 So. 2d 722 (Moffitt v. Moffitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moffitt v. Moffitt, 19 So. 2d 722, 246 Ala. 174, 1944 Ala. LEXIS 485 (Ala. 1944).

Opinion

THOMAS, Justice.

The assignment of error challenges the overruling of defendant’s demurrer to the bill of complaint. This is, in effect, an effort seeking to overrule the decision recently announced by this Court in Johnson v. Johnson, 245 Ala. 145, 16 So. 2d 401, 405. That decision is founded on well-considered authorities and will not now be declared erroneous. We are of the opinion, as we have heretofore stated, that the true rule is, that “To preserve the good order of society and to keep the peace of mind of all persons concerned, the nullity of a void marriage should be ascertained' and declared on due application while the facts are available, by a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction.” Johnson v. Johnson, supra; Rawdon v. Rawdon, 28 Ala. 565; Wightman v. Wightman, 4 Johns. Ch., N.Y. 343.

It results therefore from the foregoing that the decree of the Circuit Court should be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and FOSTER and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Allen
66 S.E.2d 226 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Jordan v. Courtney
27 So. 2d 783 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)
Faggard v. Filipowich
27 So. 2d 10 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 So. 2d 722, 246 Ala. 174, 1944 Ala. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moffitt-v-moffitt-ala-1944.