Moffitt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

207 N.C. 859
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 10, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 207 N.C. 859 (Moffitt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moffitt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 207 N.C. 859 (N.C. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe certificate in suit automatically terminated, for present purposes, wben plaintiff ceased to be an employee of tbe defendant. Tbis was tbe theory upon wbicb tbe case was tried. Tbe issue is sufficient in form to settle tbe matter. ' Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld. Boozer v. Assurance Society, 206 N. C., 848; Perry v. Assurance Society, 206 N. C., 122, 172 S. E., 527; Deese v. Ins. Co., 204 N. C., 214, 167 S. E., 797.

No error.

Schenck, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of tbis ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deese v. Travellers Insurance
167 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Perry v. . Assurance Society
172 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
207 N.C. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moffitt-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-the-united-states-nc-1934.