Moffitt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

207 N.C. 859
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 10, 1934·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Tbe certificate in suit automatically terminated, for present purposes, wben plaintiff ceased to be an employee of tbe defendant. Tbis was tbe theory upon wbicb tbe case was tried. Tbe issue is sufficient in form to settle tbe matter. ' Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld. Boozer v. Assurance Society, 206 N. C., 848; Perry v. Assurance Society, 206 N. C., 122, 172 S. E., 527; Deese v. Ins. Co., 204 N. C., 214, 167 S. E., 797.

No error.

Schenck, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of tbis ease.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moffitt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 207 N.C. 859 (N.C. 1934).

207 N.C. 859 (Moffitt v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Deese v. Travellers Insurance
167 S.E. 797 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Perry v. . Assurance Society
172 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)