Moffitt v. . Assurance Society
This text of 176 S.E. 244 (Moffitt v. . Assurance Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Civil action to recover on certificate of group insurance, tried upon the following issue:
"1. Was the employment of the plaintiff L. R. Moffitt by American Enka Corporation in effect on 25 February, 1932, as alleged? Answer: `No.'"
Plaintiff testified that he worked for the defendant until 4 February, 1932. He seeks to recover for an injury sustained on 25 February, 1932.
Judgment on the verdict for defendant, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.
The certificate in suit automatically terminated, for present purposes, when plaintiff ceased to be an employee of the defendant. This was the theory upon which the case was tried. The issue is sufficient in form to settle the matter. The verdict and judgment will be upheld. Boozer v.Assurance Society,
No error.
SCHENCK, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 S.E. 244, 207 N.C. 859, 1934 N.C. LEXIS 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moffitt-v-assurance-society-nc-1934.