Moffie v. Sharaf

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Moffie v. Sharaf

178 N.E.2d 872, 343 Mass. 775, 1961 Mass. LEXIS 887

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 13, 1961·Published

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. The defendant excepted to the denial by the judge of Ms motions for a directed verdict and for a new trial and to a ruling on a [776] matter of evidence in this action of contract for services rendered by the plaintiff as architect in the remodelling of a building owned by the defendant. A finding of liability on the part of the defendant, as distinguished from the bankrupt corporation of which he was treasurer, was clearly warranted by the evidence. Other exceptions have been fully considered. We perceive no reversible error.

Paul B. Sugarman, for the defendant. Joseph B. Abrams, (Bobert T. Abrams with him,) for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Exceptions overruled. The defendant excepted to the denial by the judge of Ms motions for a directed verdict and for a new trial and to a ruling on a [776] matter of evidence in this action of contract for services rendered by the plaintiff as architect in the remodelling of a building owned by the defendant. A finding of liability on the part of the defendant, as distinguished from the bankrupt corporation of which he was treasurer, was clearly warranted by the evidence. Other exceptions have been fully considered. We perceive no reversible error.

Paul B. Sugarman, for the defendant. Joseph B. Abrams, (Bobert T. Abrams with him,) for the plaintiff.

Moffie v. Sharaf, 178 N.E.2d 872, 343 Mass. 775, 1961 Mass. LEXIS 887 (Mass. 1961).

Pincite

178 N.E.2d 872 (Moffie v. Sharaf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.