Moffett v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California·Decided August 25, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-01562·Unknown

Opinion

GWEN M., Case No.: 23-cv-1562-KSC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS [DOC. NO. 2] KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed with her Complaint in forma pauperis. Doc. No. 2. A court may authorize the commencement of a suit without prepayment of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit, including a statement of all his or her assets, showing that he or she is unable to pay the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The affidavit must “state the facts as to [the] affiant's poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.” United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir.1981) (internal quotations omitted). A party need not be completely destitute to proceed in forma pauperis. Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339–340 (1948). An affidavit is sufficient if it shows that the applicant cannot pay the fee “and still be able to provide himself [or herself] and dependents with the necessities of life.” Id. (internal quotations omitted). Here, plaintiff's application is supported by a declaration that her monthly expenses slightly exceed her monthly income. The Court finds paying the filing fee would impose a hardship on plaintiff. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiff's Application to Proceed with his Complaint in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Dated: August 25, 2023 li. My Lae Se Hon. Karen S. Crawford United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moffett v. Kijakazi, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Moffett v. Kijakazi (Moffett v. Kijakazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.
335 U.S. 331 (Supreme Court, 1948)