Moelupe v. Pisa

1 Am. Samoa 491
CourtHigh Court of American Samoa
DecidedMay 11, 1933
DocketNo. 11-1932
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Am. Samoa 491 (Moelupe v. Pisa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering High Court of American Samoa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moelupe v. Pisa, 1 Am. Samoa 491 (amsamoa 1933).

Opinion

[492]*492The High Court convened at the Courthouse in Fagatogo on Thursday May 11, 1933 at 9:00 a.m. to hear the above entitled case.

Presiding: Chief Justice E. C. JOHNSON, Associate Judge PELE, Associate Judge MULI

Túfele, District Governor of Manua: I request the Court to please postpone this case as we would like to try and settle this case outside of court. Especially as I am the District Governor, I therefore request the Honorable Court if this case could be postponed and try to settle outside either among the parties concerned or before a Samoan commission.

Chief Justice: The Court would like to ask you a question, Túfele. Pisa of Olosega has filed for registration the matai name Gala and Moelupe has filed an objection. Do you represent either side in the case — just who do you represent or who are you interested in?

Túfele: I have no special interest in this case except as a District Governor I would like to see if this case could be settled outside of court for the benefit of the family in order that they may live in peace and happiness.

Chief Justice: Do you mean one family or both families?

Túfele: Both families.

Chief Justice: Moelupe stand up. You object to the registration of the name Gala by Pisa, do you think that there is any chance of arriving at a satisfactory conclusion of this case if it is postponed today?

[493]*493Moelupe: There is no chance that I know of because I have already tried to settle this matter outside of Court but I have failed.

Chief Justice: Have you made an honest attempt to get together with Pisa’s family to try and settle it — how many times have you tried?

Moelupe: About two or three times I have made an attempt to Pisa to withdraw this case from Court but Pisa refused.

Chief Justice: Pisa, what have you to say about this, do you want the case contined? [sic]

Pisa: I would like to have the case tried.

Pele: We would rather see matai name cases settled outside.

Chief Justice: The Court would always rather see a matai name case settled among the people themselves but I want to remind you that this case was up for trial three weeks ago when Pisa came to see me in the movie pavilion and I warned him that he must make an attempt to try and settle the case outside. We must settle the cases sometimes. We have Pisa and Moelupe, the two parties to the case here who want to try the case but we have on the other hand Túfele who is the District Governor in Manua and who wants to postpone the case and try to settle it outside. It does not look now as if they will be able to settle this case. The Court will say this. The case will be continued once more if one of the parties will guarantee the cost of ten dollars in this case for bringing in the two district judges and preparing for the case. If this ten dollars is not guaranteed by anyone the case will go on this morning.

Pisa: As far as my side is concerned we would like to settle this case outside of court as District Governor Túfele suggested but there is no question of settling this case outside. Moelupe made one attempt but he was trying [494]*494to settle this case in his favor which caused more argument, therefore we came before the court this morning and we think it is better to try the case.

Chief Justice: Is there anything else you want to say, Túfele? It appears that both parties are here with their witnesses and want to try the case and unless very good reason is shown we will have to go ahead and try the case.

Túfele: As I previously stated before the court I have no particular interest in this case except that I would like to see the parties settle this case outside of court, but I can see now that the parties now want to try the case and it is better for the court to try the case now.

Chief Justice: The court has a great regard for what Túfele says and would be very reluctant to try the case if he states that it should not be tried, but it now appears from his last statement that it is best to go ahead with the case. Pisa, will you take the stand?

This is the matai name case Gala. The registration of the name was filed by Pisa of Ofu and objection to the registration of this name has been made by Moelupe of Ofu. Before we proceed I surmise that it is almost unnecessary to remind the respective parties that you have a Judicial Commission that has been created to hear cases of this kind, that is, matai name and land cases. You find yourself before the High Court this morning and the High Court presumes that you have waived your right to go before the Judicial Commission. If you do not choose to take this case before your Commission the decision of this court will be absolutely final. You will have no appeal from the decision which the court will arrive at.

Proponent takes stand and is duly sworn.

Q. Pisa, are you represented by counsel?

A. Yes, Savali.

[495]*495Q. Where do you live, Pisa?

A. Ofu.
Q. How long have you been living in Ofu ?
A. About three years.
Q. Where were you living before you went to Ofu?
A. InTutuila.
Q. Whereabouts in Tutuila?
A. Pagatogo.
Q. How long were you living in Fagatogo ?
A. About twenty years.
Q. How old are you ?
A. I think about twenty-seven.
Q. Are you a matai?
A. No.
Q. If you are not a matai are you a member of the Gala family?
A. The Gala family have chosen me to be the matai of the family.

Q. How many members are there in the Gala family? A. There are fifteen matais of the Gala family.

Q. How many people are in the family?
A. Two members.
Q. Is the Gala family a large or small family?
A. A large family.

Q. I want you to answer my question that I asked before as to whether you are a member of the Gala family.

Q. Are you aware of the fact that the Fono has passed a mandate down to the court that only matais shall be selected by virture [sic] of their hereditary right.

A. I do.
Q. Who do decend [sic] from in the Gala family?
A. I descend from Seu.

[496]*496Q. You say that the Gala family have gotten together and request that your name be posted for the name Gala.

A. Yes.

Q. How many members in that family supported your candidacy for the matai name Gala?

A. Thirteen.
Q. Are they men or women?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Am. Samoa 491, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moelupe-v-pisa-amsamoa-1933.