Moeller v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Election Comm'rs

Missouri Court of Appeals

Moeller v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Election Comm'rs

556 S.W.3d 685

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 9, 2018

DocketNo. ED 107148

StatusPublished

This text of 556 S.W.3d 685 (Moeller v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Election Comm'rs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moeller v. St. Louis Cnty. Bd. of Election Comm'rs, 556 S.W.3d 685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The Committee for a Healthy Community ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's grant of a permanent injunction in favor of Mike Moeller ("Respondent"), based on declaratory judgment findings that Appellant's Initiative Petition ("Petition") violated the full text requirement of Article X, Section 10.010.3 of the St. Louis County Charter ("County Charter"), and that its Petition was not in substantial compliance with Section 106.030 of the St. Louis County Code of Ordinances ("County Code").

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The Committee for a Healthy Community ("Appellant") appeals from the trial court's grant of a permanent injunction in favor of Mike Moeller ("Respondent"), based on declaratory judgment findings that Appellant's Initiative Petition ("Petition") violated the full text requirement of Article X, Section 10.010.3 of the St. Louis County Charter ("County Charter"), and that its Petition was not in substantial compliance with Section 106.030 of the St. Louis County Code of Ordinances ("County Code").

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

556 S.W.3d 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moeller-v-st-louis-cnty-bd-of-election-commrs-moctapp-2018.