Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC.
156 N.E.2d 919, 5 N.Y.2d 945
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the sole question presented involves a nonreviewable exercise of discretion (Quick Service Novelty Corp. v. Scharf, 4 N Y 2d 799; Feingold v. City of New York, 4 N Y 2d 783). No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conwat and Judges Desmond, Dte, Fuld, Froessel, Van Yoorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC., 156 N.E.2d 919, 5 N.Y.2d 945 (N.Y. 1959).
156 N.E.2d 919 (Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.