Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC.

New York Court of Appeals

Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC.

156 N.E.2d 919, 5 N.Y.2d 945

DecidedFebruary 26, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 156 N.E.2d 919 (Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moebus v. PAUL TISHMAN CO., INC., 156 N.E.2d 919, 5 N.Y.2d 945 (N.Y. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that the sole question presented involves a nonreviewable exercise of discretion (Quick Service Novelty Corp. v. Scharf, 4 N Y 2d 799; Feingold v. City of New York, 4 N Y 2d 783). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conwat and Judges Desmond, Dte, Fuld, Froessel, Van Yoorhis and Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 N.E.2d 919, 5 N.Y.2d 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moebus-v-paul-tishman-co-inc-ny-1959.