Moebs v. Wolffsohn

8 N.E. 892, 143 Mass. 130, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 37
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 26, 1886·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

A constable is exempt from serving as a juror. Pub. Sts. o. 170, § 2. But if a constable is duly drawn and serves as a juror, this does not entitle a party to a new trial as of right. Upon this point, the case of Munroe v. Brigham, 19 Pick. 368, is decisive.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moebs v. Wolffsohn, 8 N.E. 892, 143 Mass. 130, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 37 (Mass. 1886).

8 N.E. 892 (Moebs v. Wolffsohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. French
259 N.E.2d 195 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)
Commonwealth v. Hayden
28 L.R.A. 318 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)