Moe v. University of Minnesota

773 N.W.2d 77, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 632, 2009 WL 3210603
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 5, 2009
DocketA09-958
StatusPublished

This text of 773 N.W.2d 77 (Moe v. University of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moe v. University of Minnesota, 773 N.W.2d 77, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 632, 2009 WL 3210603 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 27, 2009, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [sjummary af-firmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Helen M. Meyer Associate Justice

PAGE and GILDEA, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
773 N.W.2d 77, 2009 Minn. LEXIS 632, 2009 WL 3210603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moe-v-university-of-minnesota-minn-2009.