Modzinski v. Klaus and Associates, Inc.
This text of 239 S.W.3d 134 (Modzinski v. Klaus and Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appellants Mike and Debbie Modzinski appeal from the ruling of the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, the Honorable Emmett O’Brien presiding, after Judge O’Brien granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants Klaus and Associates, Inc. et al.
The Modzinskis bring three claims of error, arguing that the Circuit Court erred in grating summary judgment in favor of defendants because the defendants did not file a memorandum of law with the amended motion for summary *135 judgment in violation of Rule 74.04(c)(1), the plaintiffs presented a prima facie case against defendant ECS for successor liability, and the plaintiffs presented a prima facie case of piercing the corporate veil against defendants Troy Ruiz and Scott Ruiz.
We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and no error of law appears. Therefore, an opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been given a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 S.W.3d 134, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1592, 2007 WL 4106267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/modzinski-v-klaus-and-associates-inc-moctapp-2007.