Modica v. Rodgers

219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 332, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1837
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 5, 1975·No. No. 752DC566·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiffs excepted to “the signing and entry of judgment and findings of fact.” This exception is broadside and does not bring up for review the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings but presents only the face of the record for review, which includes whether the facts found or admitted support the judgment and whether the judgment is proper in form. Davenport v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 283 N.C. 234, 195 S.E. 2d 529 (1973). Accordingly, we have carefully examined the face of the record and conclude the findings of fact support the judgment entered, and the judgment is proper in form.

Affirmed.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Clark concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Modica v. Rodgers, 219 S.E.2d 260, 27 N.C. App. 332, 1975 N.C. App. LEXIS 1837 (N.C. Ct. App. 1975).

219 S.E.2d 260 (Modica v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

South Carolina Insurance v. Hallmark Enterprises, Inc.
364 S.E.2d 678 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)