Modern Painting Co. v. Scheinberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Modern Painting Co. v. Scheinberg

155 So. 2d 561

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 6, 1963

DocketNo. 62-736

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 So. 2d 561 (Modern Painting Co. v. Scheinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Modern Painting Co. v. Scheinberg, 155 So. 2d 561 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s complaint for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien was dismissed by the chancellor on defendants’ motion when it appeared that the lien had become outlawed by lapse of time for failure of the lien claimant to file in the circuit court the notice required by § 84.21, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. In so ruling the chancellor was eminently correct, and we affirm the order of dismissal on the authority of Cowherd & Sanderlin, Inc. v. Modern Improvement Co., Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 786, and authorities cited therein.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s complaint for foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien was dismissed by the chancellor on defendants’ motion when it appeared that the lien had become outlawed by lapse of time for failure of the lien claimant to file in the circuit court the notice required by § 84.21, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. In so ruling the chancellor was eminently correct, and we affirm the order of dismissal on the authority of Cowherd & Sanderlin, Inc. v. Modern Improvement Co., Fla.App.1962, 142 So.2d 786, and authorities cited therein.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 So. 2d 561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/modern-painting-co-v-scheinberg-fladistctapp-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack