Modern Food Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Modern Food Products Co. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 414

United States Customs Court·Decided June 18, 1959·No. No. 63179; protests 58/16143, etc. (San Francisco)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Richter Bros., Inc. v. United States (44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim at 5% percent under paragraph 718(b), as modified, supra, was sustained, except that the merchandise covered by protest 307783-K was held dutiable at 6% percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Richter Bros., Inc. v. United States (44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim at 5% percent under paragraph 718(b), as modified, supra, was sustained, except that the merchandise covered by protest 307783-K was held dutiable at 6% percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra.

Modern Food Products Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

42 Cust. Ct. 414 (Modern Food Products Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related