Modern Food Products Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Modern Food Products Co. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 414

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 18, 1959

DocketNo. 63179; protests 58/16143, etc. (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 414 (Modern Food Products Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Modern Food Products Co. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 414 (cusc 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Richter Bros., Inc. v. United States (44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim at 5% percent under paragraph 718(b), as modified, supra, was sustained, except that the merchandise covered by protest 307783-K was held dutiable at 6% percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Richter Bros., Inc. v. United States (44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim at 5% percent under paragraph 718(b), as modified, supra, was sustained, except that the merchandise covered by protest 307783-K was held dutiable at 6% percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/modern-food-products-co-v-united-states-cusc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack