Modern Book and News Co. v. Sternman

1922 OK 218, 207 P. 961, 86 Okla. 257, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 172
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 20, 1922
Docket13235
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1922 OK 218 (Modern Book and News Co. v. Sternman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Modern Book and News Co. v. Sternman, 1922 OK 218, 207 P. 961, 86 Okla. 257, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 172 (Okla. 1922).

Opinion

JOHN'S ON, J.

This is an appeal by transcript. The ‘petition in error contains but one assignment, which is:

“Said court erred in overruling the motion of plaintiffs in error for new trial.”

The motion to dismiss this appeal was filed, with proof of service thereon, on May 2, 1922. To which no response has been made.

A motion for new trial, and the action of the court in overruling the same, being no part of the record, without case-made or bill of exception, cannot be presented to the *258 court by transcript. Collins v. Garvey, 67 Oklahoma, 171 Pac. 330; Wyant v. Beavers, 63 Okla. 68, 162 Pac. 732; Miller v. Markley, 49 Okla. 177, 152 Pac. 345; Vannier v. Frat. Aid Ass’n, 40 Okla. 732, 140 Pac. 1021; Williams v. Kelly, 71 Oklahoma, 176 Pac. 204.

In the absence of a case-made or bill of exceptions, the errors complained of cannot be considered. The motion to dismiss must be sustained, and it is so ordered.

HARRISON, C. J-, and ELTING, KENNA-MER, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Spurrier Lbr. Co.
1928 OK 192 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1922 OK 218, 207 P. 961, 86 Okla. 257, 1922 Okla. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/modern-book-and-news-co-v-sternman-okla-1922.