Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.
50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 385, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 216
This text of 50 S.E. 121 (Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mock v. Savannah & Statesboro Railway Co., 50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 385, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 216 (Ga. 1905).
Opinion
If the verdict was not demanded by the law and the evidence, the Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial, though it was put upon a single ground ; nor will it determine whether the trial court was right in granting the motion on the special ground.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Daniel v. Mitchell
168 S.E. 12 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Sampson v. Smith
116 S.E. 652 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Parks v. Stevens
94 S.E. 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Fertilizer & Chemical Co. v. Peacock
91 S.E. 928 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
McCarty v. Mobley
80 S.E. 523 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)
Cox v. Grady
64 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 385, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mock-v-savannah-statesboro-railway-co-ga-1905.