Mock v. Mock

369 S.E.2d 255, 258 Ga. 407
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 23, 1988·No. 45658·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

In this case the trial court found both parents equally fit to raise the minor child. However, the trial court granted custody of the child to the father because of his further finding that the mother was at fault in causing the divorce by her adulterous conduct. The trial court’s ruling was based on OCGA § 19-9-l(a) which provides in part: “In all cases in which a divorce is granted, the party not in default shall be entitled to the custody of the minor children of the marriage.” However, this part of the statute is overridden by the rule that “[a]s between parents the right of custody depends upon what will promote the welfare of the children.” Gunnells v. Gunnells, 225 Ga. 188, 189 (1) (167 SE2d 138) (1969).

While the trial court may consider the conduct of the parties on the issue of custody, see Harris v. Harris, 240 Ga. 276, 277 (240 SE2d 30) (1977), the court ultimately must decide the custody question based on the best interest of the child.

We remand the case to the trial court for further consideration of the custody question in light of this opinion. See Lifsey v. Lifsey, 256 Ga. 613 (351 SE2d 637) (1987).

Case remanded.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mock v. Mock, 369 S.E.2d 255, 258 Ga. 407 (Ga. 1988).

369 S.E.2d 255 (Mock v. Mock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. Hibbard
770 S.E.2d 600 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2015)
Rose v. Rose
755 S.E.2d 737 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2014)
Todd v. Todd
696 S.E.2d 323 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2010)
Patel v. Patel
577 S.E.2d 587 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Edwards v. Edwards
563 S.E.2d 888 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Templeman v. Earnest
434 S.E.2d 106 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1993)