Mochon v. Mochon

74 A.D.3d 1156, 902 N.Y.S.2d 427
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 A.D.3d 1156 (Mochon v. Mochon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mochon v. Mochon, 74 A.D.3d 1156, 902 N.Y.S.2d 427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Adams, J.), dated April 15, 2009, as, in effect, denied, without prejudice to renewal, that branch of her motion which was for an order directing entry of a judgment for child support arrears in the sum of $49,440.

[1157]*1157Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for an order directing entry of a judgment for child support arrears in the sum of $49,440 is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.

Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 244, “[w]here a spouse in an action for divorce . . . defaults in paying any sum of money as required by the judgment or order directing the payment thereof. . . [u]pon application the court shall make an order directing the entry of judgment for the amount of arrears of child support together with costs and disbursements.”

Here, the defendant former husband did not dispute the plaintiff former wife’s contention that he owed the sum of $49,440 in child support arrears. Since Domestic Relations Law § 244 requires that a judgment be entered upon application when a party is in default on child support payments (see Moheban v Moheban, 149 AD2d 488 [1989]; see also Matter of Dox v Tynon, 90 NY2d 166 [1997]), it was error for the Supreme Court to deny, without prejudice to renewal, that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for an order directing entry of a judgment for child support arrears in the sum of $49,440. Mastro, J.P., Florio, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Theophilova v. Dentchev
117 A.D.3d 531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.3d 1156, 902 N.Y.S.2d 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mochon-v-mochon-nyappdiv-2010.