Moccoldi v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moccoldi v. Grossman

248 A.D. 673

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Order reversed on" the facts, with costs, motion denied, with costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: The evidence presented a fair question of fact as to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff and the verdict in that respect was not against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (The order sets aside the jury verdict in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Bdgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on" the facts, with costs, motion denied, with costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: The evidence presented a fair question of fact as to the contributory negligence of the plaintiff and the verdict in that respect was not against the weight of the evidence. All concur. (The order sets aside the jury verdict in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Bdgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Moccoldi v. Grossman, 248 A.D. 673 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 673 (Moccoldi v. Grossman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.