Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment

953 A.2d 760, 196 N.J. 341, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 903

DecidedJuly 8, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 953 A.2d 760 (Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment, 953 A.2d 760, 196 N.J. 341, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 903 (N.J. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to remand the matter to the Jersey City Board of Adjustment to reconsider Brunswick 9 Associates, LLC’s variance application and for specific findings regarding the positive and negative criteria without regard to whether “the subject site may have been improperly zoned.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to remand the matter to the Jersey City Board of Adjustment to reconsider Brunswick 9 Associates, LLC’s variance application and for specific findings regarding the positive and negative criteria without regard to whether “the subject site may have been improperly zoned.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

953 A.2d 760, 196 N.J. 341, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mocco-v-jersey-city-zoning-board-of-adjustment-nj-2008.