Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment

953 A.2d 760, 196 N.J. 341, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 903
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 8, 2008·Published

Opinion

It is ORDERED that the petition for certification is granted, and the judgment of the Appellate Division is summarily modified to remand the matter to the Jersey City Board of Adjustment to reconsider Brunswick 9 Associates, LLC’s variance application and for specific findings regarding the positive and negative criteria without regard to whether “the subject site may have been improperly zoned.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment, 953 A.2d 760, 196 N.J. 341, 2008 N.J. LEXIS 903 (N.J. 2008).

953 A.2d 760 (Mocco v. Jersey City Zoning Board of Adjustment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.