Mocan v. Kukurin
This text of 178 A. 301 (Mocan v. Kukurin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These two appeals, both arising from the same set of facts, are from the refusal of the court below to award a new trial after verdict for defendant in an action of trespass to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the minor plaintiff when struck by an automobile under defendant’s control. The principal assignments of error relate to the court’s charge. We have considered them all but find no reversible error. The charge, taken as a whole, was impartial and accurate and left to the jury determination of all facts material to the issue. The verdict favored the defendant and we are concluded by it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 A. 301, 318 Pa. 265, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mocan-v-kukurin-pa-1935.