Mobley v. State

366 S.W.2d 558, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 830
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 3, 1963·No. 35314·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion on Application for Leave to File Second Motion for Rehearing.

MORRISON, Judge.

Appellant urges that we were in error in not considering the statement of facts which was tendered. Under Article 759a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., a statement of facts may be considered when filed after the expiration of the 90 days provided only when the same is approved by the trial judge because the statute says that such approval shall be sufficient proof that the time for filing was properly extended.

We may not consider what purports to be a nunc pro tunc entry of an order overruling appellant’s motion for new trial tendered in a supplemental transcript because the same was entered while the case was on appeal in this Court and the trial court was without any authority to enter any order during that time. Allen v. State, 124 Tex.Cr.R. 642, 65 S.W.2d 311, and Colbert v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 331 S.W.2d 328.

Application for permission to file second motion for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mobley v. State, 366 S.W.2d 558, 1963 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 830 (Tex. 1963).

366 S.W.2d 558 (Mobley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smithwick v. State
636 S.W.2d 557 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Walters v. State
398 S.W.2d 569 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Merrel v. State
374 S.W.2d 240 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1964)
Hoskins v. State
373 S.W.2d 248 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1963)