Mobley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Mobley v. State

237 S.W. 948, 91 Tex. Crim. 259, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mobley v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Tex. Crim. 646 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 8, 1922·No. No. 6848.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

—Upon his plea of guilty appellant was convicted for the theft of an automobile and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Notwithstanding the plea of guilty he has perfected an appeal to this court. The record comes before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment is regular and the judgment and sentence are in proper form. The matters set up in the motion for new trial can not be considered in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts and the regularity of the proceedings must be presumed.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

—Upon his plea of guilty appellant was convicted for the theft of an automobile and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Notwithstanding the plea of guilty he has perfected an appeal to this court. The record comes before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment is regular and the judgment and sentence are in proper form. The matters set up in the motion for new trial can not be considered in the absence of bills of exception and statement of facts and the regularity of the proceedings must be presumed.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mobley v. State, 237 S.W. 948, 91 Tex. Crim. 259, 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 152 (Tex. 1922).

Pincite

237 S.W. 948 (Mobley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.