Mobley v. State
60 S.E. 803, 4 Ga. App. 78, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 210
Opinion
The proposition stated in the headnote .is supported by the following decisions, and perhaps others: Mason v. Terrell, 3 Ga. App. 348 (60 S. E. 4); Glenn v. State, 123 Ga. 585 (51 S. E. 605); Johnson v. State, 125 Ga. 243 (3), (54 S. E. 184). Prom this it follows that the motion in arrest of judgment should have been sustained. If the fact be properly alleged, it may be shown inferentially or circumstantially, but it must be shown. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mobley v. State, 60 S.E. 803, 4 Ga. App. 78, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 210 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).
60 S.E. 803 (Mobley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bullard v. State
2 S.E.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Winters v. State
122 S.E. 635 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Durham v. State
88 S.E. 594 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Johnson v. State
68 S.E. 318 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Long v. State
61 S.E. 1053 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)