Mobley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mobley v. State

414 So. 2d 25, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20044

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 18, 1982

DocketNo. AJ-250

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 414 So. 2d 25 (Mobley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mobley v. State, 414 So. 2d 25, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20044 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and judgment and sentence was entered accordingly. On appeal, the assistant public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she is unable to present any argument for reversal of the judgment of conviction in this case. On review of the record, we find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm.

However, as the assistant public defender has pointed out to this court, the appellant, an indigent, was erroneously required by the judgment and sentence to pay $2 in court costs and $10 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund. Accordingly, that portion of the judgment and sentence assessing these costs is stricken. See, Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla.2d DCA 1981).

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and judgment and sentence was entered accordingly. On appeal, the assistant public defender has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she is unable to present any argument for reversal of the judgment of conviction in this case. On review of the record, we find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm.

However, as the assistant public defender has pointed out to this court, the appellant, an indigent, was erroneously required by the judgment and sentence to pay $2 in court costs and $10 to the Crimes Compensation Trust Fund. Accordingly, that portion of the judgment and sentence assessing these costs is stricken. See, Cox v. State, 334 So.2d 568 (Fla.1976); Brown v. State, 400 So.2d 510 (Fla.2d DCA 1981).

McCORD and MILLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 So. 2d 25, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 20044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobley-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack