Mobley v. Faircloth

164 S.E. 910, 45 Ga. App. 406, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 342
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 8, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 910 (Mobley v. Faircloth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mobley v. Faircloth, 164 S.E. 910, 45 Ga. App. 406, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 342 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Sutton, J.

Under the answers returned by the Supreme Court to the questions certified to it in this case (174 Ga. 808, 164 S. E. 195), the petition failed to set forth a cause of action, and the judge of the superior court therefore properly sustained a general demurrer thereto.

Judgment affin-med.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mobley v. Faircloth
164 S.E. 195 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E. 910, 45 Ga. App. 406, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobley-v-faircloth-gactapp-1932.