Mobley v. City of Monroe
This text of 140 S.E. 516 (Mobley v. City of Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The [366]*366petition as amended set out no cause of action against either defendant, and the court properly sustained the demurrers and dismissed the petition. City of Rome v. Cheney, 114 Ga. 194 (39 S. E. 933, 55 L. E. A. 221); Etheredge v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 122 Ga. 853 (50 S. E. 1003); Brown v. Panola Light and Power Co., 137 Ga. 352; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Corbett, 150 Ga. 747, 749 (105 S. E. 358), and cit.; Seaboard Air-Line Ry. Co. v. Young, 20 Ga. App. 291 (93 S. E. 29), and cit.; Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Jordan, 34 Ga. App. 350, 352 (129 S. E. 443), and cit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 516, 37 Ga. App. 364, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 683, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobley-v-city-of-monroe-gactapp-1927.