Mobley v. City of Chesapeake

Fourth Circuit

Mobley v. City of Chesapeake

223 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 2, 2007·No. 06-2063·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Bruce Mobley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mobley v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:06-cv-00139-JBF (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Floyd Bruce Mobley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mobley v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:06-cv-00139-JBF (E.D.Va. Aug. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mobley v. City of Chesapeake, 223 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 200 (Mobley v. City of Chesapeake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related