Mobley v. Askew

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mobley v. Askew

166 S.E. 772, 176 Ga. 19, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 372

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 17, 1932·No. No. 9282·Published

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment rendered by the superior court on appeal from the court of ordinary, which arose by reason of an objection to the final returns of administrators of an estate. No question is raised which would give this court jurisdiction under the constitution, art. 6, see. 2, par. 5 (Civil Code of 1910, § 6502). The ease is there- ■ fore transferred to the Court of Appeals.

So ordered.

Ml the Justices concur. E. T. Moon, G. N. Davie, and J. F. Kemp, for plaintiff. Duhe Davis, L. L. Meadors, and Terrell & Terrell, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

The exception is to a judgment rendered by the superior court on appeal from the court of ordinary, which arose by reason of an objection to the final returns of administrators of an estate. No question is raised which would give this court jurisdiction under the constitution, art. 6, see. 2, par. 5 (Civil Code of 1910, § 6502). The ease is there- ■ fore transferred to the Court of Appeals.

So ordered.

Ml the Justices concur. E. T. Moon, G. N. Davie, and J. F. Kemp, for plaintiff. Duhe Davis, L. L. Meadors, and Terrell & Terrell, for defendants.

Mobley v. Askew, 166 S.E. 772, 176 Ga. 19, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 372 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

166 S.E. 772 (Mobley v. Askew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.