Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins

70 Miss. 730

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 70 Miss. 730 (Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins, 70 Miss. 730 (Mich. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, C. 'J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Without further remark, we will reverse the judgment because of the second instruction for the plaintiffs, which, in[733]*733stead of leaving to the jury to determine as to failure to feed at Meridian, announces as a legal proposition that negligence is not predicable of that. It is a question of fact, as to which the law has no view.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, C. 'J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Without further remark, we will reverse the judgment because of the second instruction for the plaintiffs, which, in[733]*733stead of leaving to the jury to determine as to failure to feed at Meridian, announces as a legal proposition that negligence is not predicable of that. It is a question of fact, as to which the law has no view.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 Miss. 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobile-ohio-railroad-v-mullins-miss-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack