Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins

70 Miss. 730

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Campbell, C. 'J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Without further remark, we will reverse the judgment because of the second instruction for the plaintiffs, which, in[733]*733stead of leaving to the jury to determine as to failure to feed at Meridian, announces as a legal proposition that negligence is not predicable of that. It is a question of fact, as to which the law has no view.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, C. 'J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Without further remark, we will reverse the judgment because of the second instruction for the plaintiffs, which, in[733]*733stead of leaving to the jury to determine as to failure to feed at Meridian, announces as a legal proposition that negligence is not predicable of that. It is a question of fact, as to which the law has no view.

Reversed and remanded.

Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins, 70 Miss. 730 (Mich. 1893).

Pincite

70 Miss. 730 (Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related