Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, in Error v. Greenwald & Champenois, a Partnership, Etc
235 U.S. 717, 59 L. Ed. 438, 35 S. Ct. 197, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1099
Opinion
235 U.S. 717
35 S.Ct. 197
59 L.Ed. 438
MOBILE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
GREENWALD & CHAMPENOIS, a Partnership, etc.
No. 207.
Supreme Court of the United States
August 17, 1914
Messrs. L. E. Jeffiries and S. R. Prince for plaintiff in error.
No appearance for defendant in error.
Dismissed pursuant to the Twenty-eighth Rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, in Error v. Greenwald & Champenois, a Partnership, Etc, 235 U.S. 717, 59 L. Ed. 438, 35 S. Ct. 197, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1099 (1914).
235 U.S. 717 (Mobile & Ohio Railroad Company, in Error v. Greenwald & Champenois, a Partnership, Etc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nash County Board Of Education v. The Biltmore Company
640 F.2d 484 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co.
640 F.2d 484 (Fourth Circuit, 1981)
Lloyd L. Hayes, Hayes, Inc. v. T. G. Solomon, Gulf States Theatres, Inc.
597 F.2d 958 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
International Railways of Central America v. United Fruit Company
373 F.2d 408 (Second Circuit, 1967)
United States v. United Air Lines, Inc.
216 F. Supp. 709 (D. Nevada, 1962)
Fisher v. Time, Inc.
153 F.2d 806 (Seventh Circuit, 1946)
Ratner v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.
6 F.R.D. 618 (S.D. New York, 1942)