Mobile & Ohio R. v. Wood

Mississippi Supreme Court

Mobile & Ohio R. v. Wood

99 So. 768, 135 Miss. 241, 1924 Miss. LEXIS 32

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 1924·No. No. 24017·Published

Opinion

Holden, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We find no reversible error in the case, except it is --p n-ni-'qn the verdict and judgment for eighteen . dollars is excessive, and it is reversed for a n 'W nal as to damages only, unless a remittitur is entered reducing the amount to fourteen thousand dollars, in which event the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed on. remittitur to fourteen thousand dollars.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holden, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We find no reversible error in the case, except it is --p n-ni-'qn the verdict and judgment for eighteen . dollars is excessive, and it is reversed for a n 'W nal as to damages only, unless a remittitur is entered reducing the amount to fourteen thousand dollars, in which event the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed on. remittitur to fourteen thousand dollars.

Affirmed.

Mobile & Ohio R. v. Wood, 99 So. 768, 135 Miss. 241, 1924 Miss. LEXIS 32 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

99 So. 768 (Mobile & Ohio R. v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.