Mobile County Water, Sewer & Fire Protection Authority, Inc. v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer System, Inc.

564 F.3d 1290, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7721, 2009 WL 928742
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 8, 2009
Docket08-14855
StatusPublished

This text of 564 F.3d 1290 (Mobile County Water, Sewer & Fire Protection Authority, Inc. v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer System, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mobile County Water, Sewer & Fire Protection Authority, Inc. v. Mobile Area Water & Sewer System, Inc., 564 F.3d 1290, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7721, 2009 WL 928742 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mobile County Water, Sewer and Fire Protection Authority, Inc. (MoCo) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Mobile Area Water and Sewer System, Inc. (MAWSS). MoCo brought suit against MAWSS seeking injunctive relief under federal and Alabama state antitrust laws. MAWSS moved for summary judgment, arguing it was immune from liability under the doctrine of state action immunity. MoCo filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on its antitrust claims and contended MAWSS was not entitled to state action immunity.

On July 23, 2008, the district court granted MAWSS’s motion for summary judgment and denied MoCo’s motion for summary judgment. The court concluded the principles of state action immunity barred MoCo’s antitrust claims against MAWSS because MAWSS’s challenged conduct followed a clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy. Specifically, the court found MAWSS’s conduct was authorized by the Alabama legislature and its anticompetitive effect was a foreseeable result of this authorization. After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we agree MAWSS is entitled to state action immunity and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s well-reasoned order, which is published at 567 F.Supp.2d 1342 (S.D.Ala.2008).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 F.3d 1290, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 7721, 2009 WL 928742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobile-county-water-sewer-fire-protection-authority-inc-v-mobile-area-ca11-2009.