Mobile Cotton Mills v. Smyrna Shirt & Hosiery Co.
62 A. 146, 21 Del. 518, 5 Penne. 518, 1905 Del. LEXIS 52
This text of 62 A. 146 (Mobile Cotton Mills v. Smyrna Shirt & Hosiery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mobile Cotton Mills v. Smyrna Shirt & Hosiery Co., 62 A. 146, 21 Del. 518, 5 Penne. 518, 1905 Del. LEXIS 52 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).
Opinion
think, on the point that the affidavit fails to state in what respect the corporation plaintiff has not complied with the statutes of the State of Delaware, that judgment should be given notwithstanding the affidavit of defense.
Judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hance Hardware Co. v. Howard
8 A.2d 26 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1939)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
62 A. 146, 21 Del. 518, 5 Penne. 518, 1905 Del. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobile-cotton-mills-v-smyrna-shirt-hosiery-co-delsuperct-1905.