Mobile Cotton Mills v. Smyrna Shirt & Hosiery Co.
62 A. 146, 21 Del. 518, 5 Penne. 518, 1905 Del. LEXIS 52
Opinion
think, on the point that the affidavit fails to state in what respect the corporation plaintiff has not complied with the statutes of the State of Delaware, that judgment should be given notwithstanding the affidavit of defense.
Judgment for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mobile Cotton Mills v. Smyrna Shirt & Hosiery Co., 62 A. 146, 21 Del. 518, 5 Penne. 518, 1905 Del. LEXIS 52 (Del. Ct. App. 1905).
62 A. 146 (Mobile Cotton Mills v. Smyrna Shirt & Hosiery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hance Hardware Co. v. Howard
8 A.2d 26 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1939)