Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld

New York Court of Appeals

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld

41 N.Y. 944

DecidedMarch 24, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 41 N.Y. 944 (Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rubenfeld, 41 N.Y. 944 (N.Y. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was considered and rejected the contention that, under the Federal antitrust laws, appellant was entitled to the relief he sought.

Motion for a stay associated with amendment of remittitur dismissed (US Code, tit 28, § 2101, subd [f]). [See 40 NY2d 936.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, there was considered and rejected the contention that, under the Federal antitrust laws, appellant was entitled to the relief he sought.

Motion for a stay associated with amendment of remittitur dismissed (US Code, tit 28, § 2101, subd [f]). [See 40 NY2d 936.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 N.Y. 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobil-oil-corp-v-rubenfeld-ny-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack