Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive

406 A.2d 400, 137 Vt. 370, 1979 Vt. LEXIS 999
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided September 10, 1979·No. 297-78·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In a collection action, the trial court rendered judgment for the defendant with respect to an indebtedness, undisputed as to liability or amount. He had sent, and plaintiff had cashed, a check for a lesser amount with a notation of payment of account in full. Curran v. Bray Wood Heel Co., 116 Vt. 21, 68 A.2d 712 (1949), was relied upon as supporting this result.

Curran deals with an obligation disputed as to amount. Id. at 25, 68 A.2d at 715. The rule applicable to the facts found is stated in Crosby’s Admrs. v. Naatz, 98 Vt. 226, 228-29, 126 A. 547, 548 (1924):

The payment of an amount less than that for which the debtor is liable does not constitute a valid accord and *371 satisfaction, unless there was a bona fide dispute or controversy as to the debtor’s liability, or as to the amount due from him, or unless the damages are unliquidated. The requisite as a ground for compromise is a claim urged in good faith and with color of right. (Citations omitted.)

Accord, In re Estate of Boynton, 121 Vt. 98, 109, 148 A.2d 115, 122 (1959).

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for entry of judgment for plaintiff for $1,100.58 with interest and costs in each court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive, 406 A.2d 400, 137 Vt. 370, 1979 Vt. LEXIS 999 (Vt. 1979).

406 A.2d 400 (Mobil Oil Corp. v. Prive) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larson v. Candlish
480 A.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1984)
Adams v. B.P.C., Inc.
466 A.2d 1170 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1983)