Mobil Oil Corp. v. Gettner

240 A.D.2d 350, 659 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6942
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 26, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 350 (Mobil Oil Corp. v. Gettner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Gettner, 240 A.D.2d 350, 659 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6942 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered February 7, 1997, dismissing plaintiff tenant’s complaint for a declaratory judgment, and bringing up for review a prior order, same court and Justice, entered on or about January 21, 1997, which, inter alia, denied the tenant’s motion for a Yellowstone injunction and granted defendant landlord’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to reinstate the complaint and declare that the landlord has the right to an early termination of the lease, and that its notice of early termination is valid, and otherwise affirmed, with costs to defendants. The appeal from the order is unanimously [351]*351dismissed as superseded by the appeal from the judgment. The matter is remanded to the motion court for findings of fact as to the amount of the early termination payment.

The court properly held the use of the word "any” in the Early Termination Clause, section 28.01 of the subject lease, to be clear and unambiguous, and thus the Development Parcel requirement was met by inclusion of parcels 100 feet from the premises fronting First Avenue, and properly denied the use of parol evidence.

However, while the court correctly disposed of the action in landlord’s favor, rather than granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the court should have declared the rights of the parties. Thus, the order and judgment are modified to reinstate the complaint and grant judgment in favor of defendants, declaring the notice of early termination to be valid (see, Carroll v Eno, 237 AD2d 102). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Education of Poughkeepsie City School District v. City of Poughkeepsie
113 A.D.3d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D.2d 350, 659 N.Y.S.2d 458, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6942, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobil-oil-corp-v-gettner-nyappdiv-1997.