Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fairfax Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fairfax Drainage District

505 P.2d 687, 211 Kan. 9

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJanuary 20, 1973

DocketNo. 46,456

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 P.2d 687 (Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fairfax Drainage District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fairfax Drainage District, 505 P.2d 687, 211 Kan. 9 (kan 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Article 3, § 2 of the Kansas Constitution, after its amendment of November 7, 1972, still requires the concurrence of not fewer than four justices of this court for a decision. One justice being disqualified and the remaining six being equally divided, the decision of the trial court must stand. See Tramill v. Holland, 210 Kan. 180, 499 P. 2d 1075, and cases cited therein.

The judgment is affirmed.

Fromme, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Article 3, § 2 of the Kansas Constitution, after its amendment of November 7, 1972, still requires the concurrence of not fewer than four justices of this court for a decision. One justice being disqualified and the remaining six being equally divided, the decision of the trial court must stand. See Tramill v. Holland, 210 Kan. 180, 499 P. 2d 1075, and cases cited therein.

The judgment is affirmed.

Fromme, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 P.2d 687, 211 Kan. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobil-oil-corp-v-fairfax-drainage-district-kan-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack