Mobil Administrative Services Co. v. Mansfield Township
This text of 17 N.J. Tax 509 (Mobil Administrative Services Co. v. Mansfield Township) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant Zeta Consumer Products Corporation appeals from the denial of its application made to the Tax Court to intervene in pending litigation contesting the tax assessment of property the appellant had purchased. Appellant was held to have lacked the requisite standing to intervene as required by R. 4:33-1.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kuskin in his thorough and well-reasoned opinion reported at 15 N.J.Tax 583 (Tax Ct.1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 N.J. Tax 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mobil-administrative-services-co-v-mansfield-township-njsuperctappdiv-1997.