Moats v. Board of Barbers & Hairdressers

787 P.2d 1309, 100 Or. App. 653, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 187
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 7, 1990
DocketCA A48562
StatusPublished

This text of 787 P.2d 1309 (Moats v. Board of Barbers & Hairdressers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Moats v. Board of Barbers & Hairdressers, 787 P.2d 1309, 100 Or. App. 653, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 187 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Barbers and Hairdressers. The Board assessed a civil penalty against her for practicing manicure services without a license, in violation of ORS 690.015(1).

Petitioner argues, the state concedes, and we agree that the Board improperly increased the amount of the civil penalty from $300, which the hearings officer recommended, to $500.

The remaining assignments of error are not persuasive and require no discussion.

Civil penalty reduced to $300; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 690.015
Oregon § 690.015

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 P.2d 1309, 100 Or. App. 653, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moats-v-board-of-barbers-hairdressers-orctapp-1990.