Moak v. Snell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Moak v. Snell

247 A.D. 924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D. 924 (Moak v. Snell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moak v. Snell, 247 A.D. 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $125, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We are of the opinion that the verdict of the jury in so far as it finds that the plaintiff was entitled to wages at the rate of twenty-five dollars a month besides Ids board and lodging for eighteen months is against the weight of the evidence so far as it relates to the last twelve months of such period. All concur. (The judgment awarded damages for balance claimed due in wages as a farm laborer. The order demed a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $125, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We are of the opinion that the verdict of the jury in so far as it finds that the plaintiff was entitled to wages at the rate of twenty-five dollars a month besides Ids board and lodging for eighteen months is against the weight of the evidence so far as it relates to the last twelve months of such period. All concur. (The judgment awarded damages for balance claimed due in wages as a farm laborer. The order demed a motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moak-v-snell-nyappdiv-1936.