M.O v. J.T.C

Missouri Court of Appeals

M.O v. J.T.C

437 S.W.3d 829

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 5, 2014·No. No. ED 100368·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M.O. (“Mother”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her petition for a full order of protection against J.T.C. (“Father”) under Missouri’s Adult Abuse Act. Mother contends the trial court erred in denying her petition because there was “substantial evidence to support a finding of abuse.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

M.O. (“Mother”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her petition for a full order of protection against J.T.C. (“Father”) under Missouri’s Adult Abuse Act. Mother contends the trial court erred in denying her petition because there was “substantial evidence to support a finding of abuse.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

M.O v. J.T.C, 437 S.W.3d 829 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

437 S.W.3d 829 (M.O v. J.T.C) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.